Then, there’s the other debate: is he Dracula
or not? Well, he certainly identifies himself as Count Dracula, despite
travelling under the name of Alucard, so I guess the real question is: Is he the Dracula or merely a descendent
cashing in on the family name. (Which would be ironic considering some of
Chaney’s critics accused him of doing the same concerning his own father.) The
latter would at least explain what was, for me, the movie’s greatest fault: the
plot hinges on Dracula being a dupe in his own movie! A Dracula movie should be
about his evil plot to obtain power
or a new bride, not about a bored rich girl (Louise Allbritton) seducing him
into making her immortal, so she can dump him and be with her own true love
(Robert Paige) for eternity. Dracula is supposed to be the controller, not the controlled.Like Dracula’s Daughter, (which I still think, with its faults, is a stronger film) there are weak attempts to import elements from the original film. Paige’s Frank Stanley is another Jonathan Harker, while J. Edward Bromberg’s Professor Lazlo is clearly meant to be our new Van Helsing. The end result is rehash mixed with a misguided plot.
Supporting features:
Porky Pig in The Sour Puss (1940)
The Our Gang short Mush and Milk (1933)
Next time:
Night Monster (1942) starring Bela Lugosi, Lionel Atwell, Leif Erickson, Irene Harvey, and Ralph Morgan
No comments:
Post a Comment